A PAULINE THEOLOGY OF PREACHING: PART 1
By R.
Larry Overstreet
Director
of D.Min. Program and Professor of Homiletics
Northwest
Baptist Seminary
Abstract
Although Paul�s ministry testifies that he was an effective preacher, he never wrote a systematic theology of preaching. His writings, however, clearly indicate that he thought theologically, as well as polemically and practically. An examination of his epistles, therefore, along with Luke�s contributions found in the book of Acts, reveals the concepts of Paul�s theology of preaching. This paper is an initial step in the explication of that theology showing its continuing relevance for today�s preaching of God�s Word.
Introduction
Books have been written which deal with the life, ministry, travels, theology, and epistles of the Apostle Paul.[1] Likewise, several volumes deal with general ideas related to the theology of preaching, both its theological foundations and its theological content.[2] In view of this plethora of writings, therefore, it seems strange that so little material actually deals with Paul�s theology of preaching. What did Paul believe was the purpose of preaching? What was his emphasis on preaching�s content? What clues does he give concerning his approach to, and methodology of, preaching? Nowhere does Paul delineate a systematic theology of his views on preaching. Paul�s letters, rather, were written to meet particular needs in the lives of churches or individuals. They are occasional letters. This does not mean, however, that his theology of preaching cannot be gleaned. Longenecker, while approaching the subject with a different goal than I have in this paper, correctly observes, �Nonetheless, sufficient material has been preserved under the direction of the Holy Spirit to allow a fairly clear picture of the main outlines of the apostle�s thought.�[3]
Synthesizing the terminology related to Paul�s theology of preaching is the goal of this paper. An examination of the pertinent Greek words connected with Paul related to the oral communication of God�s word will be set forth. These are words used by Paul in his epistles, and of Paul in the book of Acts. These will be analyzed so that their contribution to the subject at hand is identified. From this analysis general conclusions will be drawn concerning his theology of preaching. A later paper will examine pertinent texts which directly connect to Paul�s theology of preaching.
Greek Words Examined
Numerous words are used in the New Testament by Luke of
Paul�s preaching and by Paul concerning his preaching.[4]
These will be set forth in alphabetical order, keeping word
groups together in the discussion. Particular
attention is given to those references related directly to Paul�s
personal ministry. Many of
the terms are also used by Paul to challenge or describe others (for
example, khruvssw [kērussō]
in 2 Tim. 4:2), some of those references are also delineated in this
paper.
Avggevllw (avnaggevllw,
avpaggevllw, diaggevllw, kataggevllw, kataggeleuv")
Avgge,llw.
While the verb avgge,llw
(angellō), to
announce, only occurs in John
Avnagge,llw.
The verb avnagge,llw
(anangellō), to announce, to proclaim, is used of Paul�s
communication in Acts 15:4;
Avpagge,llw. The verb avpagge,llw (apangellō), to announce, to tell, is used of Paul�s proclamation only in Acts 26:20. Here its stress is on making something known publicly.[7] In this text Paul gives his defense before Agrippa, asserting that he did not disobey his heavenly vision, and as a result �kept declaring�that they should repent and turn to God�.�
Diagge,llw.
The verb diagge,llw
(diangellō), to
proclaim, to make a report, is used of Paul�s �cultic
announcement�[8]
that he had completed the days of his purification in Acts 21:26 in the temple
of
Katagge,llw.
The verb katagge,llw
(katangellō), to
proclaim, to announce, is used by Luke of Paul�s preaching in: Acts
13:5, 38;
Kataggeleu,j.
The noun kataggeleu,j
(katangeleus), preacher, is used once in the New
Testament, of Paul, in Acts 17:18. The
Epicurean and Stoic philosophers recognized that he
was a �proclaimer of
strange deities.�
Euvaggeli,zw (proeuaggeli,zomai)
Euvaggeli,zw. The verb euvaggeli,zw (euangelizō), to preach the gospel, to announce good news, is used in a variety of ways in secular literature, such as, of the good news of a victory, or the good news of liberation from demonic powers.[11] In the New Testament, with few exceptions, the word is used of proclaiming the good news of the saving gospel of Jesus Christ, and doing so �with full authority and power.�[12]
Luke uses this verb seven times in Acts to
refer to Paul�s preaching:
Paul also uses this verb to refer to his preaching the gospel in:
Romans 1:15; 15:20; 1 Corinthians 1:17; 9:16, 18; 15:1, 2; 2 Corinthians
10:16; 11:7; Galatians 1:8, 11, 16, 23; 4:13; Ephesians 3:8.
Paul is �eager to preach
the gospel� (Rom.
Proeuaggeli,zomai.
The verb proeuaggeli,zomai (proeuangelizomai), to proclaim good news in advance, only occurs
once in the New Testament, Gal.3:8, and does not relate to Paul�s own
preaching.
Khruvssw
, khvrux)
From the time of Homer onward, the herald had a special place of dignity. A herald could be the envoy of a king, a messenger between nations at war, someone who made public announcements, one who kept order in the assemblies, and the word �herald� was at times interchangeable with avpovstoloς (apostolos).[13] The personal characteristics required in a herald included having a powerful voice so that he could be heard, and delivering the message exactly as it was given to him. This was because the message the heralds announce �does not originate with them. Behind it stands a higher power.�[14] Paul twice uses the noun khvrux (kērux), a herald, in 1 Timothy 2:7 and 2 Timothy 1:11, asserting that he was �appointed a preacher.�
Khvrussw. In the New Testament, the verb khvrussw (kērussō) emphasizes the public announcement, proclamation of something. In itself it �does not mean the delivery of a learned and edifying or hortatory discourse in well-chosen words and a pleasant voice. It is the declaration of an event.�[15]
Luke uses this verb, to announce publicly, to
herald, of Paul�s preaching in: Acts
In his epistles, Paul uses this verb of his own preaching twelve times. He stresses that his proclamation is �the word of faith� (Rom. 10:8), �the gospel of God� (1 Thess. 2:9), which brings hope (Col. 1:23), because it centers in �the Son of God, Christ Jesus� (2 Cor. 1:19), who is �Christ crucified� (1 Cor. 1:23), the �Lord� (2 Cor. 4:5), who �has been raised from the dead� (1 Cor. 15:11, 12), and declared openly to others (1 Cor. 9:27), including the Gentiles (Gal. 2:2).
Paul twice interacts with the teachings of
false teachers by using this word. In
2 Corinthians 11:4 Paul was �afraid (11:3) that the believers in
In addition to describing his own ministry of proclamation, Paul challenges Timothy to proclaim his message of God�s Word both �in season and out of season� (2 Tim. 4:2).
The significance of this word as it applies to preachers of God�s Word has been ably summarized by Friedrich:
Sinful men are commissioned by God to declare
this message to men. These
men are neither miracle-workers nor philosophers.
They are neither profound scholars who can convince all by their
learning nor skilled orators who can bind men by their powerful speech.
They are heralds�no more�.
We do not preach ourselves, our ethical qualities or our
experiences, but Christ (2 C. 4:5) [sic].
Nevertheless, the life of the preacher is not negligible.
There should not be a discrepancy between the message and the
conduct of the preacher� The
messenger does not act for himself or in his own interests.
He does not attach men to himself, but to Christ.
Christ is the Lord. He
proclaims Christ, not himself (2 C. 4:5) [sic].[17]
Marturevw (diamartu,romai,
martu,romai)
Marturevw.
The verb marturevw (martureō)
originally had the meaning, ��to invoke someone as a witness about
something,� esp. the gods,� and then developed into the additional
nuance �of an emphatic affirmation that something is so.�[18]
Both of these emphases are seen in the New Testament.
The verb occurs four times in Acts connected with Paul�s oral
proclamation. The emphasis
of the word on the idea of �to confirm or attest someth. [sic] on the
basis of personal knowledge or belief, bear witness, be a witness�[19]
is found in Acts
The additional emphasis of the verb in the
book of Acts, �to affirm in a supportive manner, testify favorably, speak well (of), approve,�[20]
is seen in Acts
Paul uses this word in his epistles most of
the time with the idea of attesting to something, bearing witness, on
the basis of personal knowledge or belief.
The intriguing item here is that he does not use it in reference
to bearing witness to Christ or His gospel.
In Romans 10:2 Paul bears witness to the ignorant zeal of the
Jews. In 2 Corinthians 8:3
Paul testifies to the generous charity of the Macedonian churches.
In Galatians
Only in 1 Thessalonians 2:11 does Paul
emphasize the nuance of affirming in a supportive manner.
There he writes that the Thessalonians were �witnesses� (
Martuvromai.
The synonymous verb, martuvromai
(marturomai),
to bear witness, occurs in Acts 20:26, of Paul�s ministry, where he testifies
with solemnity that he is �innocent of the blood of all men.�
In a similar manner Paul solemnly testifies �to every man who
receives circumcision, that he is under obligation to keep the whole
law� (Gal. 5:3). Paul has
a different emphasis in using this verb in Ephesians 4:17, �This I
say, therefore, and affirm�that
you walk no longer just as the Gentiles also walk.�
Here the emphasis of the verb is �to urge someth. [sic] as a
matter of great importance.�[21]
Diamartuvromai.
The related verb, diamartuvromai
(diamarturomai),
to bear witness to, is used six times by Luke describing Paul�s ministry.
In all these occurrences it has the idea of �to make a solemn
declaration about the truth of someth. [sic] testify
of, bear witness to.�[22]
That solemn declaration includes the fact that �Jesus was the
Christ� (Acts 18:5), a declaration �to both Jews and Greeks of
repentance toward God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ� (Acts
20:21), through �the gospel of the grace of God� (Acts 20:24),
whether in Jerusalem or Rome (Acts 23:11), which will bring them into
�the kingdom of God� (Acts 28:23).
Through this whole process the Holy Spirit declares that Paul
will endure �bonds and afflictions� (Acts
Paul uses diamartuvromai
(diamarturomai) four
times of his own proclamations. He
uses the verb with a different emphasis than Luke does.
That sense is: �to exhort with authority in matters of
extraordinary importance�, solemnly
urge, exhort, warn.�[23]
He issues a warning about sexual impurity in 1 Thessalonians 4:6,
�that no man transgress and defraud his brother�as we also told you
before and solemnly warned
you.� Paul issues a solemn
charge to Timothy �in the
presence of God and of Christ Jesus and of His
chosen angels, to maintain these principles
without bias� (1 Tim.
Nouqetevw
The modern concept of �nouthetic counseling� borrows its title from the verb nouqetevw (noutheteō), to admonish, to warn, which is directly related to oral ministry in the New Testament. �Etymologically it means �I put in mind� from tivqhmi [tithēmi] and nou`ς [nous].�[24]
Luke uses this verb once of Paul�s
preaching in Acts 20:31, �Therefore be on the alert, remembering that
night and day for a period of three years I did not cease to admonish
each one with tears.� Paul
had put them in mind of false teachers (
Paul also uses the verb of his own ministry
and of the ministry of others. Paul�s
ministry of writing was done in order �to admonish
you as my beloved children� (1 Cor.
In addition to his own ministry Paul applies
the term to the ministry of others. Paul
encourages the Romans that they are �able also to admonish one another� (Rom.
Parakalevw (paravklhsiς)
Parakalevw. The verb parakalevw (parakaleō) literally means �to call to one�s side,� and from that concept various nuances of the term developed. In its common occurrences in ancient Greek, its usages fell into four broad categories: to call to, to beseech, to exhort, and to comfort.[27] These general divisions are also seen in the New Testament,[28] although the dividing line between �beseech� and �exhort� is not always clear. Moo observes that the verb�s �semantic range lies somewhere between �request� and �command��[29]
Luke uses the verb of Paul�s ministry in the first three
categories above. The
initial meaning of �to call to� is found in Acts 28:20, where Paul
invites the Jews in
The concept of �beseeching� is found in
Acts 24:4 where Paul addresses Felix with the words, �But, that I may
not weary you any further I beg
you to grant us, by your kindness, a brief hearing.�
This concept of beseeching is also seen in Paul�s journey to
The idea of exhortation is found in three
instances in Acts. In
Acts
Paul uses parakalevw
(parakaleō) of
his own ministry numerous times in his epistles.
He does not use it in the general sense of �to call to,� but
the other three broad categories all occur in his writings.
The concept of �beseeching� can be identified in several
occurrences. In Romans
The person involved in the preaching of
God�s Word can readily apply principles seen in this verb.
We must urge believers under our care to be aware of false
teachers (Rom.
The nuance of parakalevw
(parakaleō)
stressing the idea of exhortation also occurs frequently.
On the basis of God�s mercies, which he enunciated in Romans
1-11, Paul asserts, �I urge [better, �exhort�]
you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, to present your
bodies� (Rom. 12:1). The
force of the verb in this verse is that �an exhortation comes with
authority, but the authority of a preacher who is the mediator of
God�s truth rather than the authority of a superior issuing a
command.�[31]
Likewise in Romans 12:8, when speaking of spiritual gifts Paul
challenges, �he who exhorts
in his exhortation� (using
both the verb and the related noun).
This is a case where �the word probably denotes the activity of
urging Christians to live out the truth of the gospel.�[32]
In a similar manner, Paul exhorts (NASB, urge)
the Roman Christians to pray for him (Rom.
Some difficulty in deciding on the force of the term is encountered at 2 Corinthians 10:1. On the one hand, it may be that Paul is giving a mere entreaty, an appeal (NASB has urge) to the Corinthians in view of a hostile minority toward him; the idea of an appeal is supported by Paul using the verb �ask� (devomai, deomai) in 10:2. On the other hand, Paul�s reference to �the meekness and gentleness of Christ� places it in a stronger position than a mere appeal; therefore, the idea of exhort seems more in keeping with the context.
The reference to parakalevw (parakaleō) found in 2 Corinthians 13:11 is also problematic. An interpretive question exists here as to whether the verb has the idea of �comfort� (NASB, �be comforted�), or the idea of an exhortation or admonition (NIV, �listen to my appeal�). Plummer takes it as an exhortation, asserting that �This might mean �be of good comfort� (AV) or �be comforted� (RV), but more probably it means �be exhorted�, i.e. �listen to my exhortations and entreaties.��[36] Those exhortations and entreaties have been numerous in the context of the book, and the idea of exhortation fits best in this closing section of the book.
The idea of �comfort� as the meaning of parakalevw (parakaleō) is particularly emphasized in 2 Corinthians 1:3-7. The verb occurs four times, and its related noun (paravklhsiς, paraklēsis, see next page) appears an additional six times in this section. It has the dual emphasis in the context of the �consoling help through God�s present and future salvation� along with that consolation which comes from men, �but it is real comfort only because God is finally and essentially the Comforter.�[37]
It is significant that paravklhsiς
[paraklēsis] and swthriva
[sōtēria, salvation]
are used together here, and that the perseverance of the Corinthians in
affliction, in which the consolation is at work, fills the apostle with
sure hope for them. In other
words, although the reference is to consoling help through the present
salvation of God, this consolation stands in the light of future
deliverance.[38]
Paravklhsiς. The noun paravklhsiς
(paraklēsis) occurs once in the book of Acts related to Paul�s
ministry (
Paul uses the noun some twenty times in his letters, many of
which relate to the proclamation of God�s word.
His use of the term in Romans 12:8 was noted above.
In Romans 15:4 Paul specifically connects the term to the Old
Testament, saying �that through perseverance and the encouragement
of the scriptures we might have hope.�
This assurance is then immediately connected to �the God who
gives perseverance and encouragement�
(15:5). Another emphasis on
the concept of encouragement is found in 2 Thessalonians 2:16, where
Christ and the Father have �given us eternal comfort
[better �encouragement�]
and good hope,� which is connected with the verb in
Paul�s use of the noun with the idea of �comfort,� in conjunction with the verb, in 2 Corinthians 1:3-7 was commented on above. He also uses the noun in conjunction with the verb in 2 Corinthians 7:4, 7, 13.
The noun is used in the sense of beseeching in two occurrences in
2 Corinthians. In 8:4 the
Macedonian churches begged Paul �with much entreaty
for the favor of participation in the support of the saints.�
In the same chapter Paul refers to the willingness of Titus to
accept �our appeal� (
When Paul writes about the subject of unity to the Philippians, he says that if �there is any encouragement in Christ�, make my joy complete by being of the same mind� (Phil. 2:1). �To understand the term in this context as implying more than just comfort is consistent with other Pauline statements on unity.�[39] Encouragement is gained in ministry, therefore, as biblical unity of believers is achieved.
Examining Paul�s use of this term demonstrates that he, and
other believers as well, can experience encouragement (including
comfort) from both God the Father (1 Cor. 1:3) and from Jesus Christ
(Phil. 2:1). Encouragement
can also be gained from the Scriptures (
Paul informs the Thessalonians that he was bold in speaking the gospel (1 Thess. 2:2). Having said that, Paul then tells them, �our exhortation does not come from error or impurity or by way of deceit� (1 Thess. 2:3), but because he was entrusted with the gospel by God. Thomas makes a crucial observation concerning this word:
�Appeal� [NIV] hints at the gently
persuasive form of Paul�s preaching.
Whether hortatory or consolatory, paraklēsis
(�appeal�) always addresses the will in quest of a favorable
decision, but the intellect is not excluded.
Persuasion, however, is of various types, both wholesome and
otherwise. Paul and his
fellow workers had apparently been accused of appealing on wrong
grounds. The damage from
this accusation he is quite anxious to repair.[40]
In addition to his own ministry of exhortation, Paul
challenged Timothy to make this a characteristic of his ministry.
He tells Timothy, �Until I come, give attention to the public
reading of Scripture, to exhortation
and teaching� (1 Tim.
Parrhsiavzomai (parrhsiva)
Parrhsiavzomai. The verb parrhsiavzomai (parrēsiazomai), to speak freely, to speak fearlessly, is used four times by Luke in the book of Acts related to Paul�s preaching. Paul uses it twice to refer to his own preaching.
When Paul and Barnabas had �nearly the whole city� (Acts
Moving on from
Paul�s ministry in
Paul�s defense before Agrippa is the final occurrence of this verb in Acts. Answering the charge of Festus that Paul is �out of [his] mind� and �mad,� Paul replies that he is not insane and that �the king [Agrippa] knows about these matters, and I speak to him also with confidence, since I am persuaded that none of these things escaped his notice� (26:26). More literally, the verse reads, �to him indeed being bold of speech I speak.�
In all the references in the book of Acts the same emphasis of the verb is observed: boldness of proclamation before people. This boldness is particularly poignant since in all cases it occurs in the face of opposition, and in some cases severe opposition.
This particular verb only occurs twice in Paul�s epistles,
although the related noun occurs more frequently.
In Ephesians 6:20, Paul asks for the prayers of the Ephesians for
him that he will speak the mystery of the gospel �boldly,
as I ought to speak.� The
verb here denotes �freedom to speak with no restraints, hence to speak
freely, boldly, fearlessly, or openly.�[43]
In his other use, he looks to the recent past where he and
Silvanus and Timothy �had
the boldness in our God to
speak to you the gospel of God amid much opposition (1 Thess. 2:2).
Bruce astutely observes, �They do not say, �Having been
ill-treated at
Parrhsiva. The noun parrhsiva (parrēsia) occurs in Acts only once related to the preaching of Paul, 28:31. In that context it has the idea of �openness to the public.�[45] Concerning this final verse of Acts, Bruce makes a pointed observation:
During this period the gospel was proclaimed
freely in
Paul used the noun parrhsiva (parrēsia)
eight times in his epistles with various emphases.
In two contexts (Eph.
In 2 Corinthians
Paul uses the word three times with the
forcefulness of �openness to the public, before whom speaking and
actions take place.�[50]
In 2 Corinthians 7:4, Paul writes about the Corinthians, �Great
is my confidence in you,
great is my boasting on your behalf� (2 Cor. 7:4). He
can now speak to others with boldness about them because of the
encouraging news Titus brought him concerning their favorable attitude
toward Paul (4:6-7). In
Philippians
The final two occurrences of the noun in
Paul�s letters related to his boldness in association with humans.
In one case Paul argues that he could be bold and order Philemon
to do the right thing, to receive Onesimus back, but instead he does not
exercise that boldness and appeals to him (Phm. 8-9).
In the other case, however, Paul
requests prayer from the Ephesian believers that he may �make known
with boldness the mystery of the gospel� (Eph.
Systematizing
the Results
Numerous emphases can be drawn from systematizing the results of the study of the Greek words used by Luke in reference to Paul�s ministry of proclaiming God�s Word, and by Paul�s use of those words in his writings. These will be summarized from the study of the Greek words examined, with the focus being on those timeless principles still applicable to preachers today (omitting those which are exclusively to Paul, such as that he personally received his message from Christ, Gal. 1:11).
The ministry of the Word must have a didactic
element in it (Acts
The proclamation (1) sets forth the Word of
God (Acts 13:5; 15:36; 17:13; kataggevllw,
katangellō) (Acts 15:35; eujaggelivzw,
euangellizō) (2) identifying the person of God (Acts 17:23; kataggevllw,
katangellō), (3) who will forgive sins (Acts 13:38; kataggevllw,
katangellō), (4) through the way of salvation (Acts 16:17; kataggevllw,
katangellō), (5) which is presented in the gospel (1 Cor. 9:14;
kataggevllw, katangellō; 1 Thess. 2:9; khruvssw,
kērussō), (6) for
both Jews and Gentiles (Acts 26:23; kataggevllw,
katangellō; Gal. 2:2; khruvssw,
kērussō), (7) that
gospel being that Jesus is the Christ (Acts 17:3; kataggevllw,
katangellō; Acts 18:5; diamartuvromai,
diamarturomai), (8) the Son of
God (Acts 9:20; khruvssw, kērussō),
(9) who was crucified (1 Cor.
1:17; 2:1; kataggevllw, katangellō; 1 Cor. 1:23; khruvssw,
kērussō) and
resurrected (Acts 13:32-33; 17:18; 1 Cor. 15:1-4; eujaggelivzw,
euangellizō; 1 Cor.
15:11, 12; khruvssw, kērussō),
and (10) in Him people can be made complete (Col. 1:28; kataggevllw, katangellō).
God�s message is one of repentance (Acts
To preach the gospel is to present God�s
good news with power and authority (eu�aggelivzw,
euangellizō). Preaching
the gospel should be a central characteristic of the ministry of God�s
Word (Acts 14:7, 15, 21;
The ministry of God�s Word must also urge
believers to live properly (Eph. 4:1; 1 Thess.
Presenting God�s Word in ministry also
requires admonition to correct and amend errors in life so believers
will be complete in Christ (Col. 1:28; nouqetevw,
noutheteō).
In doing this the preacher regards his listeners as his beloved
children (1 Cor.
A crucial element in presenting God�s Word is that of encouragement/exhortation/ comfort. Preaching should encourage believers to continue in the faith (Acts 14:22; parakalevw, parakaleō), confident that God Himself gives encouragement (Rom. 15:5; paravklhsiς, paraklēsis) through His Scriptures (Rom. 15:4; paravklhsiς, paraklēsis).
Preaching
should exhort believers to complete dedication (
Believers not only need exhortation, but because of the difficulties of life also need comfort. God�s present and future salvation is a consolation, which we can experience and share with others (2 Cor. 1:3-7; parakalevw, parakaleō).
Conclusion
This paper provides a first step toward understanding a Pauline theology of preaching. Focusing on the Greek words connected to the ministry of God�s Word used of Paul and by Paul delineates numerous critical principles applicable to today�s preacher. Those principles are both instructive and challenging to all who seek to proclaim faithfully the Scriptures.
Future study must focus on specific texts of
Scripture in developing Paul�s theology of preaching.
Although some scholars may argue that 1 Corinthians 2:1-5
presents the apostle�s key theological summary of preaching,[52]
this perspective is short-sighted and restrictive.
This present paper demonstrates that Paul�s theology of
preaching is more extensive than any single passage explicates.
To examine the subject more fully requires a study of Paul�s
own sermons as found in Acts, his
expository modeling in the use of Old Testament texts in preaching, and
consideration of his additional instructions concerning the proclamation
of God�s Word, such as, in his exhortations to the Thessalonians (1
Thess. 2:1-14) and to Timothy (2 Tim. 2:14-26; 3:10-4:5).
As those areas are integrated with the terminology of preaching
developed in this paper, a more complete perspective on a Pauline
theology of preaching will be reached.
NOTES
[1]
The following books, for example, have no particular information on
Paul�s theology of preaching: F.
F. Bruce, Paul: Apostle of the
Heart Set Free (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977); W. J. Conybeare and
J. S. Howson, The Life and
Epistles of St. Paul (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans rpt, 1959); James D.
G. Dunn, The Theology of Paul the Apostle (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1997);
John McRay, Paul: His Life and
Teaching (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2003); Olaf Moe, The
Apostle Paul: His Life and His work (Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1950);
and Ben Witherington III, The
Paul Quest: The Renewed Search for the Jew of Tarsus (Downers
Grove: IVP, 1998). Herman
N. Ridderbos, Paul: An Outline of His Theology, trans. John Richard de Witt (Grand
Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975) has less than two full pages on the
�proclamation of the Word in the assembly of the church,� 482-84;
and, Thomas R. Schreiner, Paul;
Apostle of God�s Glory in Christ: A Pauline Theology (Downers
Grove: IVP, 2001) has a helpful chapter (two), �Proclaiming a
Magnificent God,� which describes Paul�s mission, but it also has
no systematic approach to Paul�s theology of preaching.
[2]
However, these volumes dealing with New Testament theology do not
discuss Paul�s theology of preaching:
G. B. Caird and L. D. Hurst, New
Testament Theology (Oxford: Clarendon, 1995); Donald Guthrie, New Testament Theology (Downers Grove: IVP, 1981); George Eldon
Ladd, A Theology of the New
Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974); Leon Morris, New Testament Theology (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1986); Georg
Strecker, Theology of the New
Testament, trans. M. Eugene Boring (Louisville: Westminster John
Knox, 2000).
[3]
Richard N. Longenecker, The
Ministry and Message of Paul (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1975), 87.
[4]
A comparative chart of the words is found in the appendix of this
paper.
[5]
S.v. avnaggelw
by Julius Schniewind in TDNT, vol. 1 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans,
1976), 61-62.
[6]
S.v. avnaggelw in BDAG, 3rd
edition (
[7]
S.v. avpaggevllw in BDAG, 95.
[8]
S.v. diaggevllw
by Julius Schniewind in TDNT, vol. 1, 68.
[9]
S.v. kataggevllw in BDAG, 515.
[10]
S.v. kataggevllw by Julius
Schniewind in TDNT, vol. 1, 71.
[11]
S.v. euvaggelivzomai by
Gerhard Friedrich in TDNT, vol. 2, 1976, 720.
[12]
Ibid.
[13]
S.v. khvrux
in LSJ (Oxford: Clarendon Press,1968), 949.
[14]
S.v. khvrux
by Gerhard Friedrich in TDNT, vol. 3, 1976, 686-88.
[15]
Ibid., 703.
[16]
Robert B. Hughes, Second Corinthians (Chicago: Moody, 1983), 101.
[17]
Ibid., 710.
[18]
S.v. martuvromai by H.
Strathmann, in TDNT, vol. 4, 1977, 510, 511.
See also marturevw in
LSJ, 1082.
[19]
S.v. marturevw
in BDAG, 617.
[20]
Ibid., 618.
[21]
S.v. martuvromai in BDAG, 619.
[22]
S.v. diamartuvromai in BDAG,
233.
[23]
Ibid.
[24]
Stewart Custer, A Treasury of
New Testament Synonyms (Greenville: Bob Jones U. Press, 1975),
123.
[25]
S.v. nouqetevw by J. Behm in
TDNT, vol. 4, 1977, 1022.
[26]
S.v. nouqetevw in BDAG, 679.
[27]
S.v. parakalevw by Otto
Schmitz in TDNT, vol. 5, 774-76; see also LSJ, 1311.
[28]
S.v. parakalevw in BDAG,
764-65, which divides the verb�s usage into five categories, which
are encompassed in the four divisions set forth in TDNT: (1) to
ask to come and be present where the speaker is, call
to one�s side; (2) to urge strongly, appeal
to, urge, exhort, encourage; (3) to make a strong request for
someth. [sic], request, implore,
entreat;
(4) to instill someone with courage or cheer, comfort,
encourage, cheer up; and (5) treat someone in an inviting or congenial manner.
[29]
Douglas J. Moo, The Epistle to
the Romans, NICNT (Grand rapids: Eerdmans, 1996),
748-49.
[30]
Peter T. O�Brien, Word
Biblical Commentary: Colossians, Philemon, vol. 44 (Waco: Word,
1982), 289.
[31]
Moo, Romans, 749.
[32]
Ibid., 767.
[33]
R. C. H. Lenski, The
Interpretation of St. Paul�s First and Second Epistles to the
Corinthians (Minneapolis: Augsburg
, 1961), 38.
[34]
S.v. parakalevw by Otto
Schmitz in TDNT, vol. 5, 795.
[35]
C. F. Hogg and W. E. Vine, The
Epistles to the Thessalonians, 1914 (Fincastle, VA: Scripture
Truth, 1959), 278.
[36]
Alfred Plummer, A Critical and
Exegetical Commentary on the Second Epistle of
St Paul
to the Corinthians,
[37]
S.v. parakalevw by Otto
Schmitz in TDNT, vol. 5, 796-97.
[38]
Ibid., 798.
[39]
Homer A. Kent, Jr., �Philippians,� The
Expositor�s Bible Commentary,
ed. Frank E. Gaebelein, vol. 11 (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1978), 121.
[40]
Robert L. Thomas, �1 Thessalonians,� The
Expositor�s Bible Commentary,
ed. Frank E. Gaebelein, vol. 11 (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1978), 251.
[41]
Homer A. Kent, Jr., The Pastoral
Epistles: Studies in I and II Timothy and Titus (Chicago: Moody,
1975), 162.
[42]
Albert Barnes, Notes on the New
Testament Explanatory and Practical: Acts, ed. Robert Frew (Grand Rapids:
Baker, 1961), 213.
[43]
Harold W. Hoehner, Ephesians: An
Exegetical Commentary (
[44]
F. F. Bruce, Word Biblical
Commentary: 1 & 2 Thessalonians (Waco: Word, 1982), 25.
[45]
S.v. parrhsiva in BDAG, 781.
[46]
F. F. Bruce, Commentary on the
Book of the Acts, NICNT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1974), 535.
[47]
S.v. parrhsiva by Heinrich
Schlier in TDNT, vol. 5, 1977, 883
[48]
S.v. parrhsiva in BDAG, 781.
[49]
R. V. G. Tasker, The Second
Epistle of Paul to the Corinthians, Tyndale NTC (Grand rapids:
Eerdmans, 1977), 64.
[50]
S.v. parrhsiva in BDAG, 781.
[51]
Kent, �Philippians,� 114.
[52] For example, Zemek writes, �This one short paragraph constitutes Paul�s personal paradigm for preaching, and by extension, covers the whole gamut of conveying God�s truth to needy people. Consequently, the ultimate Christian communications seminar is compressed into the affirmations of these five verses.� George J. Zemek, �Paul�s Personal Paradigm for Preaching,� New Testament Essays in Honor of Homer A. Kent, Jr., ed. Gary T. Meadors (Winona Lake: BMH, 1991), 270.